foreverinterloper:

Mark may or may not have been probed


Comin’ to steal yo girl!


pardonmewhileipanic:

BLESS THIS FUCKING CHILD OMG

(via smosh)



3ch0-lokshun:

speakintongueandcheek:

shisnojon:

heliolisk:

any cookie is bite sized if you try hard enough

image

ANY COOKIE IS BITE SIZED IF YOU TRY HARD ENOUGH

image

image

image

image

image

NOT ALL COOKIES

(via smosh)


pokemongifs:

New 3DS announced. 

Features:

Second Circle Nub

* Slighty Bigger Screen

* ZL and ZR

* Better 3D that can be viewed from the sides

* Micro SD Support

* Better Browser

* Faster CPU (Some games can only be played on the New 3DS such as Xenoblade)

* Auto Brightness adjust like in phones/tablets
* Wireless PC file transfer to SD card and such

* SFC Buttons

* Customized menu and themes (Will come in an update for older systems thank god)

* Faceplates (for smaller 3DS)

* Bunch of things rearranged for some reason, i;e Card Slot at the bottom, Stylus at the bottom etc.

**Japan release: 10-11-2014 (October 11th)**

**Worldwide release: 2015**

Could this new handheld fix the frame rate issues that XY had for ORAS?

pokemongifs:

New 3DS announced.

Features:

Second Circle Nub

* Slighty Bigger Screen

* ZL and ZR

* Better 3D that can be viewed from the sides

* Micro SD Support

* Better Browser

* Faster CPU (Some games can only be played on the New 3DS such as Xenoblade)

* Auto Brightness adjust like in phones/tablets
* Wireless PC file transfer to SD card and such

* SFC Buttons

* Customized menu and themes (Will come in an update for older systems thank god)

* Faceplates (for smaller 3DS)

* Bunch of things rearranged for some reason, i;e Card Slot at the bottom, Stylus at the bottom etc.

**Japan release: 10-11-2014 (October 11th)**

**Worldwide release: 2015**

Could this new handheld fix the frame rate issues that XY had for ORAS?


Welcome the New 3DS and 3DS LL!

evora-flux:

bout to watch a movie in the 30th dimension.

evora-flux:

bout to watch a movie in the 30th dimension.

(via fair-raccoon)


alliartist:

rifa:

prokopetz:

nebcondist1:

prokopetz:

I’ve seen this image going around, and I feel compelled to point out that it’s only half-right. It’s true that high heels were originally a masculine fashion, but they weren’t originally worn by butchers - nor for any other utilitarian purpose, for that matter.
High heels were worn by men for exactly the same reason they’re worn by women today: to display one’s legs to best effect. Until quite recently, shapely, well-toned calves and thighs were regarded as an absolute prerequisite for male attractiveness. That’s why you see so many paintings of famous men framed to show off their legs - like this one of George Washington displaying his fantastic calves:

… or this one of Louis XIV of France rocking a fabulous pair of red platform heels (check out those thighs!):

… or even this one of Charles I of England showing off his high-heeled riding boots - note, again, the visual emphasis on his well-formed calves:

In summary: were high heels originally worn by men? Yes. Were they worn to keep blood off their feet? No at all - they were worn for the same reason they’re worn today: to look fabulous.

so then how did they become a solo feminine item of attire?

A variety of reasons. In France, for example, high heels fell out out of favour in the court of Napoleon due to their association with aristocratic decadence, while in England, the more conservative fashions of the Victorian era regarded it as indecent for a man to openly display his calves.
But then, fashions come and go. The real question is why heels never came back into fashion for men - and that can be laid squarely at the feet of institutionalised homophobia. Essentially, heels for men were never revived because, by the early 20th Century, sexually provocative attire for men had come to be associated with homosexuality; the resulting moral panic ushered in an era of drab, blocky, fully concealing menswear in which a well-turned calf simply had no place - a setback from which men’s fashion has yet to fully recover.

FASHION HISTORY IS HUMAN HISTORY OK

Thank you, history side of tumblr. That “stay out of blood” thing has been driving me mad.

alliartist:

rifa:

prokopetz:

nebcondist1:

prokopetz:

I’ve seen this image going around, and I feel compelled to point out that it’s only half-right. It’s true that high heels were originally a masculine fashion, but they weren’t originally worn by butchers - nor for any other utilitarian purpose, for that matter.

High heels were worn by men for exactly the same reason they’re worn by women today: to display one’s legs to best effect. Until quite recently, shapely, well-toned calves and thighs were regarded as an absolute prerequisite for male attractiveness. That’s why you see so many paintings of famous men framed to show off their legs - like this one of George Washington displaying his fantastic calves:

… or this one of Louis XIV of France rocking a fabulous pair of red platform heels (check out those thighs!):

… or even this one of Charles I of England showing off his high-heeled riding boots - note, again, the visual emphasis on his well-formed calves:

In summary: were high heels originally worn by men? Yes. Were they worn to keep blood off their feet? No at all - they were worn for the same reason they’re worn today: to look fabulous.

so then how did they become a solo feminine item of attire?

A variety of reasons. In France, for example, high heels fell out out of favour in the court of Napoleon due to their association with aristocratic decadence, while in England, the more conservative fashions of the Victorian era regarded it as indecent for a man to openly display his calves.

But then, fashions come and go. The real question is why heels never came back into fashion for men - and that can be laid squarely at the feet of institutionalised homophobia. Essentially, heels for men were never revived because, by the early 20th Century, sexually provocative attire for men had come to be associated with homosexuality; the resulting moral panic ushered in an era of drab, blocky, fully concealing menswear in which a well-turned calf simply had no place - a setback from which men’s fashion has yet to fully recover.

FASHION HISTORY IS HUMAN HISTORY OK

Thank you, history side of tumblr. That “stay out of blood” thing has been driving me mad.

(via fair-raccoon)


deans-pies-the-doctors-bowties:

can I just remind people, this was captain jack harkness’s first line on doctor who

deans-pies-the-doctors-bowties:

can I just remind people, this was captain jack harkness’s first line on doctor who

(via fair-raccoon)